Reation to ‘Retracted’


After listening to the ‘Retracted’ radio show, I am now very conflicted about the FoxConn/ Apple Factory story. On the one hand, I am disturbed that Mike Daisey would go to such lengths to fabricate a story that generated a lot of debate about the behavior of Apple. Yet, on the other hand, I am somewhat sympathetic to what he was ultimately trying to do. After traveling to China and interviewing factory workers, Daisey was clearly disturbed by what he discovered and wanted to ensure that his observations were heard by the public. Clearly, the factory conditions in China are not great and there are certainly many risks to working the long hours that many of these workers do. However, Daisey clearly did not feel that the ‘true’ story was powerful enough to raise awareness about the issue and motivate people to question Apple’s actions. He chose to exaggerate many aspects of the story, such as meeting people who had been poisoned by Hexane, based on stories that he claims to have heard about in order to generate an emotional response from his audience. Obviously, his strategy proved to be successful as his story quickly spread across US news and social media and he was hosted on numerous other shows to speak about the issue.

All this being said, Daisey’s actions are completely unacceptable. For two years, Daisey fully contends that a story filled with lies is completely true, leading many people to unnecessarily question Apple’s actions. Though taking a closer look into the factory conditions of Apple’s suppliers is probably a good thing, the way that Daisey goes about raising the issue is completely unfair to Apple and can be considered as a type of defamation. Maybe Apple should put more effort into ensuring that its suppliers provide suitable conditions for their workers, but scrutinizing them based on made up information is not the way to go about.

Personally, I believe that the most important aspect of the whole incident was the fact that Mike Daisey proclaims himself as a ‘journalist’ and reports the story as it is news. By doing this, he implies that every single detail of his story is factual and that there is little room for interpretation. If he had gone ahead and labeled it as a ‘memoir’ and allowed people to listen to it in a ‘theatrical context’ as he claims he should have done, then there wouldn’t be such a big problem. The story probably would have still generated strong discussion about Apple’s corporate behavior, but it would have left the door open for people to question the reality of the situation.

Advertisements
By Chris M. Posted in Blog 3

2 comments on “Reation to ‘Retracted’

  1. Although I did not mention this in my own blog post, I completely agree with your analysis that Daisey’s self proclamation as a journalist is one of the more important parts of the incident. By doing this he is falsely identifying himself as a someone who is (hopefully) unbiased and writing based solely on facts. When in fact he also claims that he is producing art, therefore allowing himself to take an artistic license with his monologue. This conflict of self identification is completely unfair to the audience.

  2. I think you hit the nail on head, with the fundamental problem being Daisey’s assertion that he was a journalist presenting real, first hand accounts. While I agree it may not be a bad thing to bring factory conditions and Apple’s relationship with its suppliers into the spotlight, and shed more information on the reality in China, this certainly isn’t the way to go about it. Daisey’s approach and adherence to his story as fact however is just too much, and should stand as precedent for fact checking, especially when putting corporate actors under scrutiny as it is easy to jump on a bandwagon of critics and formulate a story like this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s